The story

Why were penal colony members from Australia moved to San Francisco in 1840's?

Why were penal colony members from Australia moved to San Francisco in 1840's?

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

The Wikipedia article about San Francisco's Barbary Coast old red light district says, under the heading "Sidney Town":

By the end of 1849, several ships from Australia brought former members of Great Britain's penal colony - including ex-convicts, ticket-of-leave men, and criminals - to San Francisco, where they would become known as the Sydney Ducks. These Australian immigrants had become so numerous that they dominated the neighborhood. They opened boarding houses and various types of groggeries which had prostitutes affiliated with their businesses.

These individuals had originally been taken to Australia as part of the British penal transportation mechanism that was operated from 1788 to 1868, described in this Wikipedia article.

The question I would like to ask:

Why were these ex-convicts, ticket-of-leave men, and criminals moved from Australia to San Francisco?

Transportation to Australia (as the criminal sentence was labelled) was not necessarily for life (although, the cost of returning to Britain essentially made it so). Many crimes that afforded a sentence of Transportation would seem to be quite petty by today's standards (stealing a loaf of bread, for example, or even just being in debt) - and the court/magistrate would state a period of service after which the transported convict would become a free person again.

So, your bread-stealer might get 5 or 7 years transportation, for example, and as long as they worked in the colony and kept out of any other trouble, they would become a free man at the end of the period. Quite a few ex-convicts eventually become important businessmen and leaders in government - some return to Britain, and others moved on elsewhere.

The wiki article makes it sound like there was simply a mass exodus in one fleet from Australia to San Francisco - but more likely, this happened over a period of time as ships with trade goods arrived from Australia with freed transportees looking to get away from the colony. As for why they would want to move to San Francisco - the 1840s was the gold rush period.

Because they were "former" members of the penal colony, or "ex-convicts," with "tickets of leave." That is, they served a term in the their Australian "prison," and once their terms were expired, they were free to go where they pleased, provided they could earn the money.

Some elected to stay in Australia. But others elected to go to the nearest free, English speaking place that was not of the British Empire. That would have been San Francisco.

Put another way, the "weren't moved" (by the authorities). They "moved" themselves.


  1. Phlegethon

    Yes... Likely... The easier, the better... All ingenious is simple.

  2. Mylo

    This is a great option

  3. Payton

    Perhaps I agree with your opinion

  4. Kagami

    I do not see the meaning in that.

  5. Tawnya

    Fascinating question

  6. Kezshura

    This issue is not being discussed.

  7. Qssim

    Without offending your neighbor,

Write a message